Introduction: A Merger That Could Redefine Inland Connectivity
‍

Union Pacific’s (UP) proposed acquisition of Norfolk Southern(NS) is drawing close scrutiny, but for shippers across Kentucky, Ohio, and Michigan, the railroad asserts one thing clearly: this deal could directly reduce logistics costs and improve access to West Coast gateways.

Today, many Midwest beneficial cargo owners (BCOs) choose East Coast ports simply because the inland routings are more straightforward and, in many cases, more affordable. UP argues its merger with NS could shift that equation — eliminating costly drayage legs and making West Coast services far more competitive for inland destinations east of Chicago.

Why Midwest BCOs Could Benefit Most

Cities including Cincinnati, Detroit, and Louisville sit in a unique position. They are close enough to Chicago to rely heavily on interchange rail services, yet far enough away that the “last-mile” component often involves expensive drayage or inefficient multi-modal coordination.

Today’s West Coast routing challenge looks like this:

1. Containers arrive at ports such as LA/Long Beach.
2. Boxes move inland by rail to Chicago.
3. Shippers must arrange a hundreds-of-miles trucking leg for final delivery into the Midwest.

UP argues that integrating NS would streamline this process by:

• Offering direct rail access deeper into the Midwest.
• Reducing, or even removing, the need for separate trucking legs from Chicago.
• Improving the cost competitiveness of West Coast routings versus East Coast alternatives.

If regulators approve the merger, the Midwest’s traditional reliance on Eastern seaboard ports could begin to shift.

The Strategic Context: Competition & Shipper Priorities

BCOs in the Midwest are increasingly sensitive to:

• Total landed cost
• Reliability of inland rail service
• Transit consistency from port to final delivery
• Reducing dwell and drayage exposure in Chicago

East Coast ports have gained market share partly because they offer predictable end-to-end inland rail solutions. West Coast gateways, meanwhile, have battled congestion and higher trucking dependencies.

A unified UP–NS network could:

• Give the West Coast a stronger inland value proposition
• Offer more integrated schedules and handoffs
• Reduce handling friction and time loss in Chicago
• Provide BCOs more routing optionality at a time of rising supply chain volatility

Broader Trend: Rail Consolidation as a Competitive Strategy

This merger discussion fits into a larger industry pattern:

• Intermodal competition is intensifying
• Shippers want simpler coast-to-door pathways
• Railroads are under pressure to modernize and reduce handoffs

For logistics professionals — particularly those serving manufacturing, automotive, and retail sectors in the Midwest —streamlined rail coverage could meaningfully shift routing decisions and distribution center strategy.

Key Takeaways for Global Logistics Decision-Makers

• Midwest BCOs may gain faster, more cost-efficient access to West Coast ports.
• The merger could significantly reduce costly Chicago-area drayage legs.
•A unified UP–NS system could improve service reliability and routing flexibility.
• East Coast ports may face renewed competition for Midwest cargo.
•The move reflects an industry-wide trend toward integrated, long-haul rail solutions.

As the regulatory process continues, shippers in the central U.S. may want to assess how a potential UP–NS merger could reshape their network design, coastal gateway strategies, and long-term distribution footprints.

Source:https://www.joc.com/article/up-says-cargo-owners-in-midwest-would-benefit-from-ns-merger-6115684

‍

‍